Search results for "Panel discussion"
showing 10 items of 10 documents
Panel Discussion: Systems for Data Analysis What they AEE; what they Could be?
1985
CRANE: I’d like to pose a couple of questions: (1) Command Languages — A tool for the astronomer or for the programmer? (2) Portability — Holy Cow or Red Herring? I propose that we start with the first one and see how far we get. If we don’t get past that, fine. If we get on to the question of portability, this is also fine. Let me just open up the discussion by asking Rudi Albrecht to make a comment.
Panel Discussion on “ how can Computer Science Contribute to the Solution of Problems Posed by Astronomers ?”
1985
A Panel was hold on June 3rd summarizing, in a way, the guide- lines and the aims of the Workshop. General questionswere addressed to M.Disney, E.Groth and D.Wells, who have expressed in the Workshop the point of view from Astronomy in the Sections “Data Analysis methodologies”, “Image processing” and “Systems for Data Analysis” respectively:
Panel Discussion on Data Analysis Trends in X-Ray and γ-Ray Astronomy 30/5/84, 11°°–12°°
1985
[The text of the panel has been edited by Dr. ozel (with indispensable help from Gabi Breuer, secretary of MPIfR) from a tape recording. The words not completely understandable are noted by (?), while various inclusions for the continuity of the text are indicated by [ ]. The slides and viewgraphs presented in the panel are added as Figures and Tables.]
Panel Summary: Behavioural Models
1997
The aim of this paper is to report the panel discussion on behavioural models of human or machine agents interacting with the environment. In particular the following hot points will been analysed: a framework for describing behaviour; learning and evolution; closure and teleonomy when it comes to behaviour; the perception-learning-planning loop; the information integration at the (pre)attentive level; knowing by acting and knowing by computing.
EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO guideline: management of urticaria
2009
This guideline, together with its sister guideline on the classification of urticaria (Zuberbier T, Asero R, Bindslev-Jensen C, Canonica GW, Church MK, Gimenez-Arnau AM et al. EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF/WAO Guideline: definition, classification and diagnosis of urticaria. Allergy 2009;64: 1417-1426), is the result of a consensus reached during a panel discussion at the Third International Consensus Meeting on Urticaria, Urticaria 2008, a joint initiative of the Dermatology Section of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), the EU-funded network of excellence, the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2)LEN), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) and the World Al…
Commentary: Where is International Accounting Research Going? Issues Needing Further Investigation
2019
Abstract A concurrent session at the 2018 American Accounting Association Annual Meeting featured the panel discussion “Where is International Accounting Research Going? Issues Needing Further Investigation.” The panelists summarized major contributions from existing research in international accounting and highlighted the factors and areas that are in need of further investigation. This paper summarizes the panelists’ prepared remarks.
EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF/WAO guideline: definition, classification and diagnosis of urticaria.
2009
Udgivelsesdato: 2009-Oct This guideline, together with its sister guideline on the management of urticaria [Zuberbier T, Asero R, Bindslev-Jensen C, Canonica GW, Church MK, Giménez-Arnau AM et al. EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF/WAO Guideline: Management of urticaria. Allergy, 2009; 64:1427-1443] is the result of a consensus reached during a panel discussion at the 3rd International Consensus Meeting on Urticaria, Urticaria 2008, a joint initiative of the Dermatology Section of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), the EU-funded network of excellence, the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2)LEN), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) and the World Allergy Organ…
Panel Summary: Symbolism and Connectionism Paradigms
1999
The aim of this chapter is to report the panel discussion on symbolism and connectionism paradigms. In particular, the following hot point are analysed: what cognitive phenomena are most difficult for connectionists to explain? what cognitive phenomena are most naturally explained in connectionist terms? is symbolic deduction a central kind of human thinking? How do people make deductions? is nondeductive reasoning done in accord with the laws of probability? what areas of knowledge do you have that are easily described in terms of symbolic rules? concepts reduced to rules, concepts reduced to networks; symbolic and connectionist mechanisms of analogy; planning, decision, explanation, learn…
Panel Discussion on Data Analysis Trends in X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Astronomy
1986
ZIMMERMANN: Let me begin the panel discussion on Data Analysis Trends in X-ray and Gamma-ray astronomy by first introducing the panel members. These are from the left to the right: Roland Diehl, Ethan Schreier, Rosolino Buccheri, Livio Scarsi, Jean-Marc Chassery and Wolfgang Voges. With the exception of Jean-Marc Chassery, who is an expert on image processing and statistical analysis, all the others have longer experience in the X-ray and Gamma-ray fields. May I ask the speakers to keep their contributions to not more than five minutes, in order to allow ample room for discussion with the audience.
Panel Discussion on Trends in Optical and Radio Data Analysis
1985
Albrecht: What I want to do is to give a brief five-minute introduction to the subject, justifying the title which puts optical and radio astronomy in one and the same category, which I believe it is, as far as data analysis is concerned, and then I will ask the panel members to give us two-minute statements of their opinions on the subject and then I would like to ask the audience to fire questions at us.